Harvard Teaching Hospital Reviewing J&J Ties to Psychiatry Unit

http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&sid=atN6Se0NVbp0&refer=home

By Rob Waters and Julie Ziegler

Nov. 25 (Bloomberg) — Massachusetts General Hospital will investigate conflicts of interest at a child psychiatry research center it established with funding from Johnson & Johnson, maker of the antipsychotic drug Risperdal.

The hospital, in a statement yesterday, said its grant specified the purpose of the center was scientific and educational, not to promote J&J’s products. Yet the center’s 2002 annual report said it would undertake studies that “will move forward the commercial goals of J&J,” according to documents released in connection with a lawsuit against the company.

The Johnson & Johnson Center for the Study of Pediatric Psychopathology was run by Joseph Biederman, a Harvard University child psychiatrist whose research helped fuel an explosion in the number of children diagnosed with bipolar disorder and treated with antipsychotics. His ties to J&J and other drugmakers were criticized in June by Senator Charles Grassley, an Iowa Republican, who said Biederman failed to disclose most of the $1.6 million he received from the industry from 2000 to 2007.

“I would question how this conduct — the acceptance of money — advances public health,” said Steven Sheller, a Philadelphia attorney who represents the families of children suing J&J in connection with side effects from Risperdal. The hospital is “supposedly interested in public health.”

David Cameron, a spokesman for Boston-based Harvard Medical School, said Harvard isn’t involved with the J&J Center at Massachusetts General, a Harvard teaching hospital.

‘Individually Governed’

“Harvard Medical School does not ‘own’ any of its teaching hospitals,” Cameron said in an e-mail. “While we are affiliated with them through academic appointments, all teaching hospitals are individually governed.”

Biederman didn’t reply to phone messages and e-mails sent to his office.

Massachusetts General, which pledged in June to investigate drug industry payments to Biederman, “takes these allegations very seriously and intends to investigate these issues thoroughly,” said Peggy Slasman, a hospital spokeswoman, in an e-mail yesterday.

The documents were released at a time of fierce debate over the increasing use by children of powerful antipsychotic drugs that can cause weight gain, diabetes and hormonal and neurological effects. Biederman is a leading proponent of the idea that bipolar disorder, once viewed as an adult disease, can begin early in childhood and be treated with drugs. People with bipolar disorder alternate between bouts of depression and mania.

The number of children diagnosed as bipolar increased 40- fold between 1994 and 2003, according to a 2007 study. Sales of drugs used to treat the condition doubled from 2003 to 2006, according to data provided to Bloomberg in 2007 by Wolters Kluwer NV, a prescription-tracking company.

Deposition Battle

Attorneys in a New Jersey state court action against J&J have been battling to depose Biederman to explore the way the company promoted the use of Risperdal. The documents about the doctor and his child psychiatry center at Massachusetts General were released as part of the legal case.

Some plaintiffs allege that J&J promoted Risperdal to patients, including children, for whom it was not approved by U.S. regulators, a practice known as “off-label” prescribing. While doctors are free to prescribe any approved drug to any patient, companies are not allowed to promote drugs for unapproved uses. Drugmakers such as Eli Lilly & Co., the maker of Zyprexa, AstraZeneca Plc, the maker of Seroquel, and J&J are being sued by states and individuals alleging off-label marketing of their antipsychotic treatments.
J&J’s Response

Kara Russell, a spokeswoman for Janssen, the J&J unit that makes Risperdal, said the company promotes the drug and other products only for their approved uses. The company supported the Massachusetts General program “to conduct rigorous clinical trials to clarify appropriate use and dosing of Risperdal in children,” she said in an e-mail yesterday.

The e-mails and internal memos released in the New Jersey lawsuit show Biederman pressed the company for money to establish the center and J&J used the data from center studies to promote Risperdal in children. J&J funded the center from 2002 to 2006.

Biederman “approached Janssen multiple times to propose the creation of a Janssen-MGH center,” according to an e-mail from a J&J executive. The center would “generate and disseminate data supporting the use” of Risperdal in children, the e-mail said. Pediatric use was approved by U.S. regulators in August 2007.

The e-mails released in the lawsuit also show that J&J was closely involved in Risperdal studies undertaken by Biederman and his colleagues at the center.

Generating the Data

In one e-mail, Gahan Pandina, a J&J clinical development executive, sent Biederman a research summary to be presented at a medical conference. The summary listed Biederman as the lead author and concluded that Risperdal “is effective” in treating children with bipolar disorder. In the e-mail, Pandina said he “was able to have our statistics department generate the summary data” and asked Biederman to review, comment and sign a form “as the presenting author.”

The influence Biederman has on other doctors was hinted at in a 2002 e-mail from Pandina, which noted the psychiatrist was “very well received” by a group of 1,000 doctors who paid $700 each for a three-day course on medications for pediatric bipolar disorder. Forming a partnership with Biederman and his program “has the potential of reaching and having a significant impact” on child psychiatrists.

To contact the reporter on this story: Rob Waters in San Francisco at rwaters5@bloomberg.net.

Posted in Big Muddy River Newsletter, Press Releases | Comments Off on Harvard Teaching Hospital Reviewing J&J Ties to Psychiatry Unit

Research Center Tied to Drug Company

When a Congressional investigation revealed in June that Dr. Joseph Biederman, a world-renowned child psychiatrist, had earned far more money from drug makers than he had reported to his university, he said that his interests were “solely in the advancement of medical treatment through rigorous and objective study.”

But e-mail messages and internal documents from Johnson & Johnson made public in a court filing reveal that Dr. Biederman pushed the company to finance a research center at Massachusetts General Hospital, in Boston, with a goal to “move forward the commercial goals of J.& J.” The documents also show that the company prepared a draft summary of a study that Dr. Biederman, of Harvard, was said to have written.

Dr. Biederman’s work helped to fuel a fortyfold increase from 1994 to 2003 in the diagnosis of pediatric bipolar disorder and a rapid rise in the use of powerful, risky and expensive antipsychotic medicines in children.

Although many of his studies are small and often financed by drug makers, Dr. Biederman has had a vast influence on the field largely because of his position at one of the most prestigious medical institutions.

Massachusetts General said in a statement Monday that it took the accusations related to the research center “very seriously” and intended “to investigate these issues thoroughly.”

Johnson & Johnson makes a popular antipsychotic medicine called Risperdal, or risperidone. More than a quarter of its use is in children and adolescents.

Last week, a panel of federal drug experts said that medicines like Risperdal were being used too cavalierly in children and that regulators must do more to warn doctors of their substantial risks. Other popular antipsychotic medicines, also referred to as neuroleptics, are Zyprexa, made by Eli Lilly; Seroquel, made by AstraZeneca; Geodon, made by Pfizer; and Abilify, made by Bristol-Myers Squibb.

Thousands of parents have sued AstraZeneca, Eli Lilly and Johnson & Johnson, claiming that their children were injured after taking the medicines; they also claim that the companies minimized the risks of the drugs.

As part of the lawsuits, plaintiffs’ lawyers have demanded millions of documents from the companies. Nearly all have been provided under judicial seals, but a select few that mentioned Dr. Biederman became public after plaintiffs’ lawyers sought a judge’s order to require Dr. Biederman to be interviewed by them under oath.

In a motion filed two weeks ago, lawyers for the families argued that they should be allowed to interview Dr. Biederman under oath because his work had been crucial to the widespread acceptance of pediatric uses of antipsychotic medicines. To support this contention, the lawyers included more than two dozen documents, among them e-mail messages from Johnson & Johnson that mentioned Dr. Biederman. A judge has yet to rule on the request.

The documents offer an unusual glimpse into the delicate relationship that drug makers have with influential doctors.

In a November 1999 e-mail message, John Bruins, a Johnson & Johnson marketing executive, begs his supervisors to approve a $3,000 check to Dr. Biederman as payment for a lecture he gave at the University of Connecticut.

“Dr. Biederman is not someone to jerk around,” Mr. Bruins wrote. “He is a very proud national figure in child psych and has a very short fuse.”

Mr. Bruins wrote that Dr. Biederman was furious after Johnson & Johnson rejected a request that Dr. Biederman had made for a $280,000 research grant. “I have never seen someone so angry,” Mr. Bruins wrote. “Since that time, our business became non-existant (sic) within his area of control.”

Mr. Bruins concluded that unless Dr. Biederman received a check soon, “I am truly afraid of the consequences.”

A series of documents described the goals behind establishing the Johnson & Johnson Center for the study of pediatric psychopathology, where Dr. Biederman serves as chief.

A 2002 annual report for the center said its research must satisfy three criteria: improve psychiatric care for children, have high standards and “move forward the commercial goals of J.& J.,” court documents said.

“We strongly believe,” the report stated, “that the center’s systematic scientific inquiry will enhance the clinical and research foundation of child psychiatry and lead to the safer, more appropriate and more widespread use of medications in children.

“Without such data, many clinicians question the wisdom of aggressively treating children with medications, especially those like neuroleptics, which expose children to potentially serious adverse events.”

A February 2002 e-mail message from Georges Gharabawi, a Johnson & Johnson executive, said Dr. Biederman approached the company “multiple times to propose the creation” of the center. “The rationale of this center,” the message stated, “is to generate and disseminate data supporting the use of risperidone in” children and adolescents.

Documents show that Johnson & Johnson gave the center $700,000 in 2002 alone. Massachusetts General said in its statement on Monday that grant agreements indicated the center “was for scientific and educational purposes only and not for purposes of promoting, directly or indirectly, the products of Johnson & Johnson and its affiliates.”

A statement Monday from Janssen Pharmaceutica, a unit of Johnson & Johnson, said it helped finance the research center in 2002 “with an objective to conduct rigorous clinical trials to clarify appropriate use and dosing of Risperdal in children.”

A June 2002 e-mail message to Dr. Biederman from Dr. Gahan Pandina, a Johnson & Johnson executive, included a brief abstract of a study of Risperdal in children with disruptive behavior disorder. The message said the study was intended to be presented at the 2002 annual meeting of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry.

“We have generated a review abstract,” Dr. Pandina wrote, “but I must review this longer abstract before passing this along.”

One problem with the study, Dr. Pandina wrote, is that the children given placebos and those given Risperdal both improved significantly. “So, if you could,” Dr. Pandina added, “please give some thought to how to handle this issue if it occurs.”

The draft abstract that Dr. Pandina put in the e-mail message, however, stated that only the children given Risperdal improved, while those given placebos did not. Dr. Pandina asked Dr. Biederman to sign a form listing himself as the author so the company could present the study to the conference, according to the message.

“I will review this morning,” responded Dr. Biederman, according to the documents. “I will be happy to sign the forms if you could kindly send them to me.” The documents do not make clear whether he approved the final summary of the brief abstract in similar form or asked to read the longer report on the study.

Drug makers have long hired professional writers to compose scientific papers and then recruited well-known doctors to list themselves as the author. The practice, known as ghostwriting, has come under intense criticism recently, and medical societies, schools and journals have condemned it.

In June, a Congressional investigation revealed that Dr. Biederman had failed to report to Harvard at least $1.4 million in outside income from Johnson & Johnson and other makers of antipsychotic medicines.

In one example, Dr. Biederman reported no income from Johnson & Johnson for 2001 in a disclosure report filed with the university. When asked by Senator Charles E. Grassley, an Iowa Republican who is leading the Congressional inquiry, to check again, Dr. Biederman said he had received $3,500. But Johnson & Johnson told Mr. Grassley that it paid $58,169 to Dr. Biederman in 2001.

A Harvard spokesman, David J. Cameron, said Monday that the university was still reviewing Mr. Grassley’s accusations against Dr. Biederman. Mr. Cameron added that the university had not seen the drug company documents in question and that it was not directly involved in the child psychiatry center at Massachusetts General.

Calls to Dr. Biederman were not returned.

Posted in Big Muddy River Newsletter, Press Releases | Comments Off on Research Center Tied to Drug Company

Kansas psychiatrist Douglas Geenens Disciplined by Kansas Board of Healing Arts

This is an overview, in no particular order, of what is publicly known about Douglas Geenens.
Douglas Lee Geenens, D.O., is a Kansas City area physician who specializes in psychiatry and child psychiatry. He has operated mainly in the Overland Park area of Kansas but also was also licensed in Missouri until October 2007. The Kansas Board of Healing Arts suspended his medical license for six months on December 11, 2004 but suspended all but seven days of the suspension. The reason for this disciplinary action was that Dr. Geenens engaged in a social and then sexual relationship with a former patient – the wife of a colleague who had come to him for treatment of “depression and marital issues”, according to the Kansas Board’s Order, which has been updated June 27, 2013.https://www.ksbha.ks.gov/home/showpublisheddocument/9892/638553395619070000

Dr. Geenens married this former patient in Key West, Florida on December 15, 2007.

Dr. Geenens was under investigation by the Missouri State Board of Registration for the Healing Arts but quietly “retired” his license in October 2007 when it was due for renewal. This, according to an official letter from the Board closed the Board’s case against him.

Dr. Geenens was the treating psychiatrist of 13-year-old Matthew Miller, who hanged himself after one week on the Geenens-prescribed antidepressant Zoloft in July 1997. Zoloft is manufactured by the the Pfizer pharmaceutical company. According to a deposition Geenens gave in a lawsuit filed by Miller’s parents against Pfizer, Geenens was (and possibly still is) a highly paid Pfizer speaker, frequently giving promotional talks on Zoloft. See the story here (particularly paragraph 28): http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1285024/posts.

Some time between December 2004 and the present, the Kansas Board of Healing Arts re-opened an investigation of Dr. Geenens, due in part perhaps to complaints filed by Citizens Commission on Human Rights, citing his ongoing relationship with the former patient as a continuing violation of rules and regulations governing the conduct of physicians.

On October 29, 2008, the Kansas Board of Healing Arts filed a 23-count disciplinary Petition against Dr. Geenens, seeking to suspend or revoke his license for numerous alleged violations. Twenty of the counts listed in the Petition allege that he prescribed psychiatric drugs without sufficient examinations. It also cites “boundary issues” in connection with improper relationships with patients. In one case, the Petition states that Geenens told a patient, “You need to get a divorce, move to the Plaza and we could have breakfast together.” The document has not yet been published by the Board, but you can see local news about it by searching in the Kansas City Star archives for: “Kansas medical board files disciplinary petition against Leawood psychiatrist” by Alan Bavley, The Kansas City Star, 30 October 2008.

Posted in Big Muddy River Newsletter, Press Releases | Comments Off on Kansas psychiatrist Douglas Geenens Disciplined by Kansas Board of Healing Arts

Psychotic Reaction: Treating ADHD In Maine

By Ed Silverman
chart

Earlier this week, the FDA advisory committee slammed the rising use of antipsychotics in youngsters, particularly to treat attention deficit disorders. The meds, you see, were approved by the agency for schiozphrenia or bipolar disorder – and only recently for youngsters, in some cases (back story).

The trend, however, to prescribe these meds for teenagers and children has actually been widespread, with Medicaid programs in several states reporting rising expenditures for antipsychotics to treat ADD or ADHD. A report issued last year by the University of South Florida found that among children 5 years or younger, 53.8 percent were prescribed antipsychotics for a diagnosis of ADHD. The figure was 48.8 percent for children between 6 and 12 years old (see page 22).

The issue is gaining attention because most of the meds can cause weight gain and metabolic disorders, and the FDA committee complained current warnings are insufficient. The meds include Johnson & Johnson’s Risperdal, Lilly’s Zyprexa, AstraZeneca’s Seroquel, Bristol-Myers Squibb’s Abilify and Pfizer’s Geodon. As we have written previously, a consortium of state Medicaid directors is evaluating the use of the drugs in children to ensure they are being properly prescribed (take a look).

And now we have another example. In Maine, spending by the state Medicaid program on each of the five widely prescribed antipsychotics has been rising for children 18 years and younger since 2000, except for Zyprexa. At the same time, ADHD has been the number one diagnosis among the same population each year, except for last year, when prolonged post-traumatic stress disorder was more widely diagnosed. See the chart. The data is courtesy of the Office of Maine Care Services.

Posted in Big Muddy River Newsletter, Press Releases | Comments Off on Psychotic Reaction: Treating ADHD In Maine

FDA Panel to Review Zyprexa Side Effects for Children

November 18th, 2008

At a meeting of the FDA’s Pediatric Advisory Committee today [11/18/08], potential label changes will be considered for Eli Lilly’s antipsychotic drug Zyprexa. The Committee will evaluate whether new warnings are necessary about the risk of potential Zyprexa side effects for children, such as severe weight gain, hyperglycemia or other metabolic effects.Zyprexa (olanzapine), is an atypical antipsychotic medication that has been used by more than 26 million people worldwide.

It is manufactured and marketed by Eli Lilly & Co., and was first approved in the United States in 1996 for treatment of schizophrenia and bipolar disorder in adults. It has also been widely prescribed off-label for other unapproved uses, such as treatment of dementia and mild forms of bipolar disorder.

Although Zyprexa is only approved by the FDA for use by those 18 years or older, it is commonly prescribed off-label to children, and Lilly has been seeking approval to market the drug for children between 13 and 17 years of age.

In documents released in advance of the advisory meeting today, FDA staffers suggested that new language should be considered to specifically warn about the potential side effects of Zyprexa for children. This could include information about the risk of weight gain and other metabolic changes that are already noted on the label for adults.

As a result of Lilly’s failure to adequately warn about these side effects in the past, the drug maker has already paid about $1.2 billion to settle over 30,000 Zyprexa lawsuits filed by users who suffered diabetes, hyperglycemia, pancreatitis and other injuries.

Lilly has also paid millions to settle claims over their marketing practices, which included claims that they marketed the drug for unapproved uses and downplayed the risk of Zyprexa side effects.

According to the New York Times, Eli Lilly is also expected to pay at least another $1 billion in restitution and fines to resolve federal criminal investigations related to their marketing of Zyprexa.

At the Pediatric Advisory Committee meeting on November 18, 2008, independent panel of experts will also consider potential side effects of Lamisil for children. According to the same FDA staff review documents, Novartis’ antifungal drug has been associated with a risk of psychiatric side effects in children, including cases of depression, suicidal thoughts and self-harm.

The Best Pharmaceuticals for Children Act of 2002 requires drug reviews for all drugs recently tested in children. The FDA advisory panel consists of outside experts who will discuss the reports and make recommendations to the FDA about adding warnings to the drug labels about potential side effects in children.

Posted in Big Muddy River Newsletter, Press Releases | 1 Comment

Use of Antipsychotics in Children Is Criticized

From The New York Times

November 18, 2008
By GARDINER HARRIS
Powerful antipsychotic medicines are being used far too cavalierly in children, and federal drug regulators must do more to warn doctors of their substantial risks, a panel of federal drug experts said Tuesday.
More than 389,000 children and teenagers were treated last year with Risperdal, one of five popular medicines known as atypical antipsychotics. Of those patients, 240,000 were 12 or younger, according to data presented to the committee. In many cases, the drug was prescribed to treat attention deficit disorders.But Risperdal is not approved for attention deficit problems, and its risks — which include substantial weight gain, metabolic disorders and muscular tics that can be permanent — are too profound to justify its use in treating such disorders, panel members said.

Go here to read the full article:

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/11/19/health/policy/19fda.html?ei=5070&emc=eta1

Posted in Big Muddy River Newsletter, Press Releases | Comments Off on Use of Antipsychotics in Children Is Criticized

Radio Host Has Drug Company Ties

from The New York Times
November 22, 2008
By GARDINER HARRIS

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/11/22/health/22radio.html?emc=eta1

An influential psychiatrist who was the host of the popular NPR program “The Infinite Mind” earned at least $1.3 million from 2000 to 2007 giving marketing lectures for drugmakers, income not mentioned on the program.

The psychiatrist and radio host, Dr. Frederick K. Goodwin, is the latest in a series of doctors and researchers whose ties to drugmakers have been uncovered by Senator Charles E. Grassley, Republican of Iowa. Dr. Goodwin, a former director of the National Institute of Mental Health, is the first news media figure to be investigated.

Margaret Low Smith, vice president of National Public Radio, said NPR would remove “The Infinite Mind” from its satellite radio service next week, the earliest date possible. Ms. Smith said that had NPR been aware of Dr. Goodwin’s financial interests, it would not have broadcast the program.

CLICK HERE TO READ THE FULL ARTICLE

Posted in Big Muddy River Newsletter, Press Releases | Comments Off on Radio Host Has Drug Company Ties

“PUTTING KIDS FIRST”: NOTHING BUT A HOAX

          Uniting together in a heated discussion on the Missouri vote, the Citizen’s Commission on Human Rights denounced “Putting Kids First” (Proposition 1) as an utter deception – a campaign aimed only at making money out of drugging children.  Infuriated that Proposition 1 was voted into existence, CCHR initiated a plan the day after elections during a seminar on human rights to make known how it was pushed by mental health agencies into existence.

          According to Proposition 1, a fund will be generated whereby a sales tax increase of 1 cent on every $4 of sales in St. Louis County will be paid to non-profit agencies that provide mental health and substance abuse services to children aged 19 and younger.  However, CCHR reports that much of the money will be used to hook children on addictive and abusive psychiatric drugs.

          The Citizen’s Commission on Human Rights, a psychiatric watchdog and human rights advocacy group, announced that the financial profit made from psychiatric drugs is now a $330 billion a year industry, without producing one single cure.

          Psychiatrists claim that Proposition 1 is needed because they are not getting enough funding for mental health and substance-abuse services for youth.  Yet, the budget for the Missouri Department of Mental Health in the last six years alone has jumped 170%, to a figure of more than $1.1 billion. “And there has been no result!” exclaimed Moritz Farbstein of CCHR in St. Louis.

          Since 2003, the Drug Enforcement Agency has reported more than 60 international drug regulatory warnings about the risks inherent in taking psychotropic drugs.  Such risks include antidepressants being capable of causing suicide and hostility and stimulants prescribed to children may put them at risk of heart problems, stroke and even death.

          For decades, CCHR has fought to expose the dangers and fraud of the psycho-pharmaceutical industry despite the objections of vested interests that profit from keeping the truth concealed.  For more information on the Citizen’s Commission on Human Rights, go to www.cchrstl.org.

Posted in Big Muddy River Newsletter, Press Releases | Comments Off on “PUTTING KIDS FIRST”: NOTHING BUT A HOAX

psychiatric shenanigans – no joke

Rajiv Tandon is known as the top psychiatrist in the State of Florida.
He is the Chief of Psychiatry over Florida’s Department of Children and Families.

This 2-1/2 minute video

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WCM3klGpQEk

shows Tandon joking about psychiatrists. It’s a funny joke, and not far from the truth.

Tandon’s activities as a Florida government official  include the promotion of antipsychotic drugs which is costing Florida millions upon millions of Medicaid dollars. His activities  were written up in the St. Petersburg Times.

See here: http://tampabay.com/news/health/article454391.ece

According to the below documentation Tandon has been working as a Florida government official while concurrently working for drug companies.


Top Florida Psychiatrist – Rajiv Tandon  - financial connections to antipsychotic drug makers:May 1, 2004Starting working at Florida’s Department of Children and Families while “on loan” from Florida State University

June 1, 2004
http://web.archive.org/web/20060331190500/http://medschool.slu.edu/psych/index.phtml?page=June2004Rounds&cat=calander
Dr. Tandon is on the Speakers Bureau for Astra Zeneca, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Eli Lilly, Janssen, and Pfizer. 

 

July 13, 2004
http://www.psipanama.org/optimizing.pdf
Rajiv Tandon, MD, Chief of Psychiatry, Florida Department of Children and Families, Tallahassee
Dr. Tandon is a consultant and a member the speakers/advisory boards for AstraZeneca, Abbott, Bristol Myers Squibb, Eli Lilly, Janssen and Pfizer
  

December 2004
http://www.jhasim.com/template.cfm?TEMPLATE=include_programinfo.cfm&ID=128&ZoneID=29&TYPE=faculty
Rajiv Tandon, MD, Chief of Psychiatry, Florida Department of Children and Families, Tallahassee, Florida
Dr Tandon reports serving as a consultant to AstraZeneca LP, Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, Eli Lilly and Company, Janssen Pharmaceutica, and Pfizer Inc.

2005 

http://www.psychsearch.net/apa2005.pdf
AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals1,4; Bristol-Myers Squibb1,4; Eli Lilly and Company1,4; Pfizer Inc.1,4; Janssen Pharmaceutica Products, LP1,4
(1 = consultant or advisory board; 4 =  speakers’ bureau)

2005
http://www.dowdencme.com/Landing.asp?TestID=36
Rajiv Tandon, MD, reports that he serves as a consultant to and on the speakers’ bureaus of AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals, Bristol-Myers Squibb Co, Eli Lilly and Co, Janssen Pharmaceutica, and Pfizer Inc.  

November 22, 2006
http://www.psychiatrictimes.com/psychiatryNews/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=195900165&cid=BreakingNews
Rajiv Tandon, M.D., of the University of Florida in Tallahassee gave a presentation.  The symposium was sponsored by Janssen pharmaceuticals. Both Dr Tandon and Dr. Feldman are members of the speakers bureau for Janssen, the sponsor of the symposium, and have financial relationships with Pfizer, AstraZeneca, and Bristol-Meyers Squibb as well.

2007

http://www.psychsearch.net/apa2007.pdf
AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP4; Bristol-Myers Squibb Company4; Eli Lilly and Company4;Janssen Pharmaceutica Products, LP 4; National Institute of Mental Health 4; Otsuka America Pharmaceutical, Inc4 ; Pfizer Inc.4 

(1 = consultant or advisory board; 4 =  speakers’ bureau)

Posted in Big Muddy River Newsletter, Press Releases | Comments Off on psychiatric shenanigans – no joke

Psychiatrist Accused of $2.8 Million Payola From Pharmaceutical Company

The cozy relationship between academic research and the pharmaceutical industry was revealed as a prominent Emory University psychiatrist failed to report $2.8 million he received in consulting fees from GlaxoSmithKline. The allegations against Charles B. Nemeroff, MD, were announced in the probe headed by Sen. Charles Grassley (R-Iowa), who is promoting a bill called the “Physician Payment Sunshine Act” that would require pharmaceutical companies and medical devise manufacturers to report payments over $500 that they make to physicians.He allegedly repeatedly underreported the amount of consulting money he was paid, year after year.

Nemeroff is the 6th physician accused since the investigation began earlier this year. These psychiatrists are from the top research institutions in the country. They are leaders in the profession and one was the president-elect for the American Psychiatric Association. The physicians consult with 20 or more drug and devise companies at one time with lucrative arrangements for speaking, conducting symposiums, and writing about the safety and efficacy of drugs.

It is critical that academic research and influential professors that do the research be independent of drug company influence and money. Several studies have shown that people who receive money from drug companies are more likely to report positive results from the drug.

Dr. Nemeroff stepped down from his role as Emory Department Chair of Psychiatry October 4 pending resolution of the issue, and as of October 14 Nemeroff stepped down from university research projects funded by the National Institutes of Health, as the federal agency cracks down on the school’s handling of potential conflicts of interest. The NIH has frozen funds for a $9.3 million project on depression led by Nemeroff.
Posted in Big Muddy River Newsletter, Press Releases | Comments Off on Psychiatrist Accused of $2.8 Million Payola From Pharmaceutical Company