Doping up our children

Doping up our children

(Orlando Sentinel Editorial)

August 31, 2009

The state’s Department of Children and Families is under fire again, and rightly so.

Recently, a task force issued its final report documenting how weak oversight and lax compliance with guidelines fostered a culture where officials often blindly doled out powerful drugs as chemical pacifiers to help caregivers manage difficult children.

These troubling concerns aren’t new to DCF. But in the wake of the withering report, DCF Secretary George Sheldon concedes lapses and vows to heed and fund task-force proposals.

Such accountability is encouraging. But we expected reform before. In 2003, the Statewide Advocacy Council report made similar findings, and concluded, “…unnecessary dispensing of psychotropic medication remains a threat to [foster children]. Until there is more information regarding the safety and efficiency of these drugs, Florida’s foster care children should be monitored closely.”

That report’s proposals were largely ignored. Now, six years later, only swift reforms and a strong mandate to comply with existing rules that govern psychotropic drugs will shelve suspicions that this is déjà vu all over again.

Gabriel Myers becomes the latest Florida foster child whose tragic end led to familiar calls for DCF reform. The boy was removed from his drug-addled mother and turned over to state custody on June 29, 2008. Gabriel hopscotched between a relative and a foster home over the next 10 months. While in state care, he received several psychotropic drugs without valid parental or court consent, as state law requires. One of the drugs, Symbyax, an adult antidepressant, can lead to suicidal thoughts or actions.

On April 16, Gabriel put a shower cord around his neck in the bathroom of his Margate foster home.

Shortly afterward, Mr. Sheldon convened the Gabriel Myers Work Group to investigate the tragedy. The group’s 26-page report outlined 148 systemic breakdowns in Gabriel’s death.

It notes the egregious disregard of safeguards for foster children that are well “articulated in statute, administrative rule, and operating procedures.” Breakdowns in communication, advocacy, supervision, monitoring and oversight only exacerbated matters.

Gabriel was repeatedly evaluated while in care, and often saw therapists, including one who noted, “It is clear that this child is overwhelmed with change and possibly re-experiencing trauma.” Somehow, though, caregivers missed the red flags.

And the report backs child advocates who long have insisted the state overmedicates kids: “Psychotropic medications are at times being used to help parents, teachers, and other caregivers calm and manage, rather than treat, children.”

In Florida, 15.2 percent of foster kids take at least one psychotropic drug, compared with a 5 percent rate among the general population.

DCF must junk the “fix-it with pharmaceuticals” mentality that, for the sake of expediency, often skirts safer avenues for taming disorderly behavior. Adopting the task force’s call for “a higher requirement for due diligence prior to seeking approval for administering these drugs” would be a step forward.

The task force outlines a raft of reforms that include beefing up therapeutic services, adding court-appointed guardians, and bringing on a medical director to direct the use of psychotropic drugs.

Mr. Sheldon says he’ll free up resources within DCF to act on the suggestions. And despite austere budgets, he vows to cajole the Legislature to fund such options as behavioral therapy as an alternative to drug therapy. But a will to change must follow words.

Mr. Sheldon told the Fort Myers News-Press that in the past, “Regrettably, I’m afraid people said, ‘We dodged a bullet’ and it [reforms] never got out into the field. That cannot be the case this time.”

It better not. Or DCF almost assuredly in the months to come will experience another tragic case of déjà vu.


Copyright © 2009, Orlando Sentinel
Posted in Big Muddy River Newsletter, Press Releases | Comments Off on Doping up our children

CCHR: What We Believe

We Believe

Watch our new video, CCHR: What We Believe

Then read CCHR’s Mental Health Declaration of Human Rights.

Posted in Big Muddy River Newsletter, Press Releases | Comments Off on CCHR: What We Believe

Video & Blog with Psycho/Pharma whisteblower Allen Jones

Get the facts about “Depression Testing” of kids from a real Insider
—renowned whistleblower, Allen Jones

Allen Jones gained international attention and press coverage as a whistleblower after he uncovered pharmaceutical industry payments to government officials for the purpose of implementing a national mental health screening/psychotropic drug treatment plan. In this video interview and blog, Allen describes the pharma funding and psycho/pharma agenda behind mental health “screening” of schoolchildren.

To read the rest of this blog article, click here

Posted in Big Muddy River Newsletter, Press Releases | Comments Off on Video & Blog with Psycho/Pharma whisteblower Allen Jones

Should You Have a Psychiatric Living Will?

Professor Emeritus of Psychiatry Dr. Thomas Szasz’s brainchild, the Living Will, is a document which provides for people of sound mind to reject the imposition of psychiatric treatment should their rights be compromised at any time in their future.

While not legally tested in every country, in 1999 it served to protect the rights of one woman. Soon after a bitter fight with her mother, the young woman suffering from pneumonia, received a knock on her door. An attorney and police officer then forcibly removed her to a nearby psychiatric hospital. Once admitted, she phoned CCHR for help, explaining that she had signed the Living Will a year earlier. CCHR faxed the signed copy of the Will to the hospital authorities and the attorney. The woman was immediately released.

Letter of Protection from Psychiatric Incarceration and/or Treatment

Should you be in a position where you may be subject to unwanted psychiatric hospitalization and/or mental or medical treatment, you may want to have copies of this signed and notarized declaration available. People who are of sound mind can sign this declaration (sometimes also called an Advance Directive) stating that they do not wish to be incarcerated and/or treated in any psychiatric facility or undergo any enforced psychiatric treatment.

What Circumstances Might Trigger the Need for a Living Will?

Speculation has been occurring about forced vaccination in response to the possibility of a flu epidemic. It may not be farfetched to imagine psychiatric involuntary commitment as a means of enforcement or quarantine.

While CCHR is not involved in the forced vaccination issue, we see it as an opportunity to remind you about the Living Will as a valid response to the general possibility of involuntary commitment or other enforced psychiatric treatment. Every 1¼ minutes, someone in the U.S. becomes the next victim of involuntary incarceration (also called Civil Commitment) in a psychiatric hospital.

Laws vary by state, but generally Emergency Detention is used most often to deprive people of liberty in order to subject them to treatment. Under most state laws it has to be determined that persons are a danger to themselves or others or are “gravely disabled.” Under some laws, however, if you are found walking down the street intoxicated, or if you get into a violent altercation with your neighbor, either would be sufficient cause to be picked up and carted off to a psychiatric hold. Emergency Detention is the fastest and easiest method of commitment; it circumvents the judicial process and deprives the person of nearly all rights. Find out more about Involuntary Commitment from here.

Download the Living Will from here.

Posted in Big Muddy River Newsletter, Press Releases | 2 Comments

TAKE ACTION NOW ON U.S. HEALTH CARE REFORM BILL

The U.S. Senate Finance Committee has voted down a measure which would require making the full Health Care Reform bill available for review before the panel votes on it. The committee has a “conceptual” version of the health-care bill rather than a full legislative text of the bill. “It would seem crazy to most people that we vote on something when we didn’t see the legislative language,” Senator Jim Bunning said, “Well, they’d be right. It is crazy.”

See WSJ article here http://3.ly/ZML

Also see America’s Healthy Future Act of 2009.

If you find it hard to believe that the U.S. Senate could vote on a bill as important as the Health Care Reform bill without A) Reading the actual text of the entire bill and B) Allowing the PUBLIC to read the entire bill, then you are not alone.

There are measures in the Health Care Reform bill that include major funding for psychiatric “screening” programs and psychiatric funding that must be eliminated.

Click here http://3.ly/Gcj to go to cchrint.org — read the provisions of the bill and contact your U.S. Senators.

Posted in Big Muddy River Newsletter, Press Releases | Tagged | Comments Off on TAKE ACTION NOW ON U.S. HEALTH CARE REFORM BILL

FDA Wants to Declare Electroshock Machines Safe

The FDA Wants to Declare Electroshock Machines Safe Without a Safety Investigation

TELL THEM NO!

The following newsletter from the Law Project for Psychiatric Rights solicits your attention and follow through. More information about shock treatment is available from the CCHR publication The Brutal Reality: Harmful Psychiatric ‘Treatments’ – report and recommendations on the destructive practices of electroshock and psychosurgery — download it by clicking here.

If individuals wish to report an adverse event associated with the use of an ECT device, please use the MedWatch Online Voluntary Reporting Form available at https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/medwatch/medwatch-online.htm. The FDA will review information submitted through the MedWatch program prior to making any changes to the classification of ECT devices.


The Food and Drug Administration is in charge of regulating medical devices just as it does drugs, including the machines used to give electroshock. But it is not doing its job. It has allowed these machines to be used on millions of patients over the past generation without requiring any evidence whatsoever that shock treatment is safe or effective!

This is so even though shock machines are Class III–high risk–devices, which by law are supposed to be investigated by clinical trials as thoroughly as new drugs and devices just coming onto the market.

But because of intense lobbying by the American Psychiatric Association–which claims the devices are safe but opposes an investigation–the FDA has disregarded its own law.

(For the full story of how shock survivors have fought for a scientific safety investigation of Electroshock for the past 25 years, see Linda Andre’s terrific new book, Doctors of Deception: What They Don’t Want You to Know About Shock Treatment.)

In April 2009–20 years after it first ruled the devices high-risk and named brain damage and memory loss as risks of the treatment–the FDA belatedly announced it would call on the manufacturers of the devices to provide evidence of safety and efficacy. The deadline for submissions has passed, but the manufacturers have not conducted any clinical trials, claiming they cannot afford them. They simply point to the opinions of shock doctors (including those who have financial interests in companies making electroshock machines) as evidence that shock is safe.

The FDA is now supposed to require electroshock machines to undergo the rigorous PreMarket Approval process (PMA) that is required of new devices, including clinical safety trials. These machines, technically known as “devices,” are referred to as Electro Convulsive Therapy (ECT), but this is a euphemistic term for running electricity through people’s brains.

The FDA could have called for this investigation any time in the past 30 years but has previously failed to do so. There is great risk the FDA will down-classify ECT machines to the low-risk Class II, without scientific evidence of its safety.

As a Class II device, electroshock machines would never have to go through the PMA process. The amount of damage that electroshock has been allowed to inflict is an outrage. We now finally have a chance to at least register our opposition because the FDA has opened up a new docket for public comment on electroshock machines. It is important for as many people as possible to write in with their opposition. Comments will be accepted up through January 8, 2010.

If you have personal knowledge or expertise about electroshock, writing about that can be good. Or you can pull information from various sources. Linda Andre’s book, Doctors of Deception is a gold mine of information. Leonard Roy Frank issued the Electroshock Quotationary in June 2006, which is a good source of material, and there is also a brand new web page of historical materials from Leonard at http://psychiatrized.org/LeonardRoyFrank/FromTheFilesOfLeonardRoyFrank.htm Also, PsychRights has quite a large collection of materials at http://psychrights.org/Research/Digest/Electroshock/electroshock.htm from which comments can be drawn.

Read the instructions for docket #FDA-2009-N0392 and submit electronic comments and information to http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/home.html#submitComment?R=0900006480a20202.

If you are not in a position to write something up, then please mail in the coupon below.


To: Food and Drug Administration
Dockets Management Branch (HFA-305)
5630 Fishers Lane, Room 1061
Rockville, MD 20852
Re: Electroconvulsive Therapy Device (882.5940),
Docket #FDA-2009-N0392
The undersigned opposes the reclassification of the ECT device to Class II by the FDA in the absence of adequate scientific evidence of its safety, and asks the agency to call for PreMarket Approval Applications for the device.

Name: _________________________________________

Address: _______________________________________
_______________________________________
Signature: ______________________________________
Date: __________________________________________

James B. (Jim) Gottstein, Esq.
President/CEO
Law Project for Psychiatric Rights
406 G Street, Suite 206
Anchorage, Alaska 99501
Phone: (907) 274-7686)  Fax: (907) 274-9493
jim.gottstein[[at]]psychrights.org
http://psychrights.org/

Posted in Big Muddy River Newsletter, Press Releases | Comments Off on FDA Wants to Declare Electroshock Machines Safe

Schizophrenia and Celiac Disease

Wheat-gluten sensitivity and mental symptoms

Gluten is a protein found in wheat, rye, barley (and possibly oats) that gives dough its sticky quality. An inability to digest these grains is called celiac disease. Estimates for those having celiac disease are generally thought to be 1% of the population, or about 1 in 100. It may be more, since not everyone displays significant symptoms.

Studies have shown celiac disease to be inordinately high in groups of people diagnosed with schizophrenia. Removing gluten from the diets of those diagnosed with schizophrenia often results in a significant improvement of behavior.

A study of schizophrenics by Dr. William Philpott showed allergic responses as follows: Wheat (64%), Mature corn (51%), Pasteurized whole cow milk (50%), Tobacco (75%), and Hydrocarbons (30%). Ninety-two percent of the patients showed allergic responses with an average of ten items per person causing reactions.

Symptoms of celiac disease can include mood swings, depression, anxiety, irritability, compulsive behavior, learning difficulties, delusions, hallucinations, incoherence, disorganization, stupor, hyperactivity, and other mental disorders, which can be misdiagnosed as schizophrenia or other mental illness.

An antibody blood test will show if the system is responding negatively to gluten. Positive diagnosis of celiac disease occurs only with an endoscopic biopsy (analyzing a tissue sample from the small intestine) which is the only way to distinguish it from food allergies or other issues. One should consult a non-psychiatric medical doctor for the antibody screening test and full diagnosis.

[Some information taken from Twenty-Nine Medical Causes of “Schizophrenia” which is excerpted from Nutrition and Mental Illness by the late Carl C. Pfeiffer, Ph.D., M.D.]

Schizophrenia

Psychiatrists remain committed to calling “schizophrenia” a mental
disease despite, after a century of research, the complete absence of objective proof that it exists as a physical brain abnormality.

Also, psychiatry clings tenaciously to antipsychotics as the treatment for “schizophrenia,” despite their proven risks and studies which show that when patients stop taking these drugs, they improve.

Psychiatrists not only admit that they have no idea what causes the symptoms characterized as schizophrenia, but also they have no scientifically validated proof whatsoever that it even exists as a discrete physical illness.

The word “schizophrenia” comes from the Greek skhizein ‘to split’ + phren ‘mind’. A useful definition of “schizophrenia” could be: an idea that one is two persons, which is remediable by a discovery of the life continuums being dramatized by the individual. A life continuum is the phenomenon of an individual’s tendency to carry on the fears, goals, habits and manifestations of others who have failed, departed or are dead. [definition from L. Ron Hubbard, 1952]

There are solutions to mental disturbances that avoid the serious risks and flaws inherent in psychiatry. Download and read the CCHR reports Schizophrenia – Psychiatry’s For Profit ‘Disease’ and What is the Alternative to Psychiatric Drugs.

DISCLAIMER: This information is for educational purposes only and is not intended to replace the advice of physicians or health care practitioners. It is also not intended to diagnose or prescribe treatment for any illness or disorder. Anyone already undergoing physician-prescribed therapy should seek the advice of their doctor before changing dosage or stopping treatment.

Posted in Big Muddy River Newsletter, Press Releases | 1 Comment

Antipsychotics Linked to Increased Risk for Hyperglycemia in Seniors with Diabetes

“Elderly individuals with diabetes who are prescribed antipsychotic medication for the first time are at increased risk for hyperglycemia…A study published in the July 27 issue of Archives of Internal Medicine shows the risk for a serious hyperglycemic episode among some older patients with diabetes who recently started an antipsychotic was 50% higher than for their counterparts who had not taken this class of drug for at least 6 months.”

[Note: Hyperglycemia is an unusually high concentration of sugar in the blood. Chronic hyperglycemia at levels more than slightly above normal can produce a very wide variety of serious complications over a period of years, including kidney damage, neurological damage, cardiovascular damage, loss of vision, etc. Acute hyperglycemia involving glucose levels that are extremely high is a medical emergency.]

This MedScape article (http://cme.medscape.com/viewarticle/707068) goes on to quote a psychiatrist, Dr. John W. Newcomer, MD, from the Center for Clinical Studies at Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, who said, “Antipsychotic medications can contribute to risk for diabetes and can contribute to risk for destabilization of existing diabetes; there’s no doubt about that…Clinicians are so desperate that they routinely reach for them [antipsychotic drugs], and actually they might not work as often or as well as people think.”

Diabetes and hyperglycemia are only two of a much longer list of possible side effects from antipsychotic drugs. For more information about this, download and read the CCHR report, The Side Effects of Common Psychiatric Drugs.

The body is an extremely complex biochemical machine, with chemical reactions and flows that occur in harmony and rhythmically one with another. They happen in specific sequences, in certain quantities, and at exact rates of speed. When a foreign substance such as a psychotropic drug is introduced into the body these flows and inner workings are disrupted. The drugs may speed up, slow down, dam up, overwhelm or deny critical metabolic substances.

This is why psychiatric drugs produce side effects. This is, in fact, why they produce any effect at all. They do not heal anything. The human body, however, is unmatched in its ability to withstand and respond to such disruptions. The various systems fight back, trying to process the foreign chemical, and work diligently to counterbalance its effects on the body.

But the body can only take so much. Quickly or slowly, the systems break down. Like a car run on rocket fuel, you may be able to get it to run a thousand miles an hour, but the tires, the engine and the internal parts were never meant for this; the machine flies apart.

If you are worried about something—a problem in life such as relationships with your friends, parents or teachers, or how your child’s school grades are going—taking any drug, illegal or psychiatric, isn’t going to solve the problem. If a drug is used to feel better when you are depressed, sad or anxious, the relief is only for a short while. If the problem is not fixed or helped you will often feel worse than before. As a drug wears off, whatever pain, discomfort or upset that was there before taking the drug can become stronger. It can make you want to keep taking the drug.

WARNING: No one should stop taking any psychiatric drug without the advice and assistance of a competent, non-psychiatric, medical doctor.
Posted in Big Muddy River Newsletter, Press Releases | Comments Off on Antipsychotics Linked to Increased Risk for Hyperglycemia in Seniors with Diabetes

Tennessee Passed Bill to Restrict Mental Health Screening in Schools

On May 5, 2009, the Governor of Tennessee signed into law Senate Bill 850 designed to restrict mental health screening in schools. This law went into effect July 1, 2009; it places restrictions on universal mental health testing, or psychiatric or socioemotional screening of juveniles, and requires certain consent by a juvenile’s parent, guardian, legal custodian, or caregiver before such testing can occur. The full text of this law can be found here:

http://www.capitol.tn.gov/Bills/106/Bill/SB0850.pdf

There are two key provisions of this new law:

1) Mental health screening [e.g. brief questionnaires designed to identify mental health problems without regard to whether there was any prior indication of a problem] is basically only permitted for a child under 16 years old if a parent or guardian has provided written, active, informed and voluntarily signed consent which may be withdrawn at any time. [There are other instances where screening may be permitted, such as a court order.]

2) A local education agency may not use the parent’s refusal to consent to administration of a psychotropic drug to a student or to a mental health screening of a student as grounds for prohibiting the child from attending class or participating in school-related activities, or as the basis of reporting the parent for child abuse or neglect. Moreover, it is unlawful to use or threaten school sanctions to coerce parental consent.

One of the screening programs used on students is TeenScreenâ„¢, the brainchild of psychiatrist Dr. David Shaffer, who admits that there is an 84 percent chance that children could be wrongly identified as suicidal or depressed.

Award winning journalist and former Congressional staff, Kelly Patricia O’Meara, in her powerful 2006 book, Psyched Out: How Psychiatry Sells Mental Illness and Pushes Pills That Kill, responded to this: “Since when does an 84 percent failure rate equate to a reliable scientific test? In other words, based on Shaffer’s study of his own test, 84 students out of 100 will be incorrectly identified as suffering from a specific mental illness. One has to wonder if parents of America are informed of this astonishing statistic as part of information to consider when having to decide whether or not to allow the mental health screening test.”

Parents consenting to mental health screening may be unaware that psychiatry is not based on physical science; i.e. psychiatrists admit they do not know the cause of or cure for any mental disorder and have no x-ray, blood or any physical test to diagnose or determine one.  All screening is based on subjective opinion, using personal and invasive questions that could lead to any child being prescribed harmful mind-altering drugs.

For more information, download and read the CCHR report

Teen Screen: Life Saving Intervention, Or Orwellian Nightmare?.

Posted in Big Muddy River Newsletter, Press Releases | Comments Off on Tennessee Passed Bill to Restrict Mental Health Screening in Schools

Life Center for a New Tomorrow

Mounting evidence shows that psychiatric drugs have side effects often worse than what they are supposed to treat. Many experts have testifed against the danger of psychiatric drugs. More and more people are becoming aware that the psychiatric industry is more a fraud than a real science.

The apparent workability of some drugs comes from the fact that it seems better to have someone sit quietly in a corner after they have been pumped full of drugs rather than seeing the same person banging his head against a wall or screaming all day long. But which state is better? One of a zombie who has no will power or is unable to act anymore, or one who is still trying to get his demons out by screaming or banging his head against the wall? One is still fighting, the other has given up.

The ultimate goal is to get rid of the fraudulent science that is psychiatry, to dispense with harmful psychotropic drugs and to replace them with an alternative that is humane, that takes into consideration the well being of the person – an alternative that would try to lift the person up above their condition instead of burying them with drugs.

It is with that goal in mind that the Life Center for a New Tomorrow was created. Located in the beautiful hills of Tennessee, it provides a peaceful, restful, non-threatening environment for people mentally challenged. People with mental conditions should not be pushed around, tied down, forced to take powerful drugs that make them feel horrible. The solution is: the worse off the condition, the lighter the approach.

We have, at the Life Center, supervisors that are trained in providing a good environment for our guests. We don’t call the people coming here patients, we call them guests. People should be treated with decency, with dignity and respect. Unfortunately, in modern psychiatric institutions such is more often not the case.

In many cases, underlying a mental condition one will find a physical malfunction. For instance, if the hormone system in the body were imbalanced, it might cause mental difficulties. People can have mood swings if their hormones are not properly balanced. There are many physical conditions that could cause a mental condition. We try to help the guests find those conditions with the help of natural doctors who are there to seek the real cause of a problem instead of masking it with a pill.

The Life Center for a New Tomorrow is a new venture but as people find out about it, it has become obvious that such a facility is in high demand. We intend to grow and to open other such facilities. Anyone interested in opening such a center or contributing to the expansion of this one is appreciated. Anyone who has a family member or a friend in need of such a facility should contact us. Please see our web site at http://www.lifecenterforanewtomorrow.com/.

Marc Vallieres
President
(615) 563-4292
Posted in Big Muddy River Newsletter, Press Releases | Comments Off on Life Center for a New Tomorrow